Processing nightmare – if anyone has any good tips for making HDR panos, I am all ears – i usually either use PTGUI to stitch a HDR with blend planes etc (preferred) or HDR individual bracketed images then stitch (in PS with HDRefx) – however the latter is very limiting since the HDR does alot of the work and I prefer to manually blend my exposures..
It also does not help that I had to take it with a UWA, around 13mm, there is plenty of artifacts and I had to spend a overly onerous amount of time trying to fix things, the sun looks crap and the red just seems off aarrghh – oh well, next time..
Very beautiful shot. :-))
nice one buddy..
Very nice one Gerard!
Wonderful perspective +Gerard Blacklock. Great shot!
It looks amazing despite what you think of it π
I think you've got it – PTGui for stitching and PS for processing. I have issues as well even with a fairly powerful PC. My main problem is handling 9GB+ files. Any filter I apply can take 30+ minutes and that's unacceptable. I even tried segmenting my panos and working on the sections and that still takes forever. There seems to be no immediate response from 3rd party filters or plugins when working on images that fall well under Photoshop's max size limit. Now I'm rambling… sorry… LOL So much to say about HDR panos!
+RC Concepcion is probably the best person I've seen doing this. Mmmaybe he could help?
Wonderful capture and Jolie foregrounds perspective and depths, sublime seascape, bravo
This wonderful photo has been selected as most excellent share on +BTP Editor's Choice (Best Top Photographer's page)
You may want to add +Gerard Blacklock to follow the great works!
You may also want to follow our sister page +BTP Daily Highlight or view daily large size shares on http://www.besttopphotographer.com
Nicole Gruber ❤
Wow! Beautiful!
Как прекрасно, даже дух захватывает. Какое счастье, что на моей планете есть такие уголки!!!
I tried that workflow for months +Gerard Blacklock and was never satisfied with it. My preferred workflow now is to stitch the pano with one or two exposures max,digitally blend in Ps and add tonemapping (if desired) in HDREfexPro (normally Deep 1) as a single image and then blend that layer for the final output to Lightroom. I've done this successfully with 58 files out of a Canon 7d on a MacMini.
I like it … great +++
It just gets better and better! Great work.
Incredible!!
Exceptional work! Very nice.
This wonderful photo has been selected as most excellent share on
+BTP Landscape Pro
You may want to add +Gerard Blacklock to follow the great works!
You may also want to follow our sister pages +BTP Daily Highlight and +BTP Editor's Choice (Best Top Photographer's page) or view daily large size shares on http://www.besttopphotographer.com . Thank you , Enjoy your day !
(Nancy Dempsey)
+Gerard Blacklock, first off, GREAT capture! The processing looks really nice. Second, I totally understand your pain. I've developed a workflow that works pretty well for me most of the time. I've detailed it in a 3 part article that starts here: http://danvphotography.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/how-to-get-amazing-detail-in-your-photographs/ (apologies up front as it's written for people who are new to HDR and panos). Hopefully there will be something in there that's useful to you!
I'm using Photomatix Pro 5 to do the tone mapping, and Photoshop CC to stitch the tif's. The results can be hit or miss depending on how much overlap you have between frames and what kind of lines you have in your overall composition. Feel free to contact me if you want to talk more about it! Keep up the great work!
EXTRA!
I've struggled with this too. There are benefits and drawbacks to both methods. I find I switch between the 2 on a case by case basis.
the road in the pic seems to be endless and i, finally, fall at the end of it…dizzy
Beautiful
+Gerard Blacklock, try +Hugin which claims to accept bracketed pano frames. Or, do HDR merges before stitching and hope the radiometric correction of your stitcher does a good job. I always manually normalize all pano frames in LR for brightness, etc. before stitching. Unlike most people, I let the camera vary its shutter speed for the frames (not manual mode).
I love it. Are you selling prints?
What happened to the 5 minute rule Gerry π
Maybe ditch the left 20% or so to bail on the sun which is dragging me over there all the time (puts the lighthouse on the third too). The clouds on the right are pretty sweet with the side glow. For me I find most of the image fine except the lighthouse seems to stand out for me (sorta like it's pasted in if you know what I mean)
Thanks for looking and commenting +sophie DIDIER , +Barry King , +Subin Varkey , +Dominique Dubied , +Shawn Hudson , +Erich Salles and +Meghan Riley (thanks π )
+Darren Neupert
yeah size is often a issue, 30+ minutes to apply a filter is pretty intense – i guess if you have a dozen so d800 raw files than 9gb comes up pretty quick.:)
Thanks +Daniel Shortt, +RC Concepcion does have some brilliant stuff π
Thanks +Alain Moreau , +BTP Landscape Pro , +Belinda V.
thanks +Галина Шитикова
we do live on a pretty amazing rock π
thanks +Mutita EdibleArt , +Walter Gawronski , +Tom Ring's Brown Daub Kia , +Bill Pevlor and +BTP Landscape Pro
+Shawn Hudson
yeah i usually use PTGUI but sometimes it does not quite get the stitching right, hence the need to use PS or something else.
I usually do the HDR stitch in PTGUI then manually blend in PS. In this case i merged the bracketed shots in HDRefx then stitched the merged images together, thus not giving me the desired ability to manually blend to what i wanted.
+Dan Villeneuve
great tutorial writeup there and what a perfect subject, one of my favorites π
I have in the past merged in photomatix then stitched in PS and this seems to work OK and is quite automated way of doing it – photomatic does give probably the best control and results of all the software i have used. However, sometimes i like that ability to really control the blending process, particularly when there are scenes with water in them, often i bracket a particular image for the water flow and whilst it may have blown highlights i don't want the HDR process to discard that bit, if you know what I mean.
Thanks for dropping by and commenting, i appreciate it!
Thanks +Robert Szcząchor , +willow 유미혜 , +Connie Russo
+Graham Green
I have also come to this conclusion, there is never a single solution for all cases, but better to a swiss army knife style of tools available to tackle each one π
+DAMIEN COWCHER
nope. π
thanks +Rodney Campbell
still exists for some images, actually i have reduced the time for most and simply decided that its better to spend longer on producing fewer better images than a larger number of mediocre ones – that and i have less time.
The sun does draw you away, but it was a crucial part of the frame – it could probably workwith the lighthouse on the left of the frame – the lighthouse does need some work, the rails and that gusset on the shadow side appear very dark which contributes to that 'pasted' in look.
+Richard Creamer
thanks – regarding the shutter priority mode for panos, that's a good idea and at the end of the day it is whatever works, if that works than I say use and stuff what everyone else is saying or doing π I briefly looked at hugin some years ago.. but never realised it could do the bracketed stitching, i think that deserves a re-visit from me, thanks mate.
Actually, +Gerard Blacklock, I keep the camera in aperture priority frame-to-frame and manually balance frames before stitching. Often, the sky needs different adjustments than the trees, foreground, etc. A bit more work, but this helps avoid over or under exposed frames when shooting in manual mode with constant aperture and shutter speed, especially with wide panoramas such as 180 degrees. For the few HDR panos I've done, I think I HDR-merged the individual frames before stitching.
I tend to never merge the frames before stitching. Also tend to shoot way more brackets during suntime… (sometimes as much as a a 9shot bracket.. just to have the range for skies/backgrounds).
I merge it in Photomatix (I loved HDR Efex 1.. really dont like 2), then merge in Photoshop. From there, mix back in some of the skies and originals into the file. Lastly, put them together in PS.
Do you have the raw files up somewhere?
RC
Stunning capture!
cheers for your thoughts and processing +RC Concepcion +RC Concepcion it just goes to show that there are no golden rules for it, simply preferred methods and ones which work in particular cases for certain people π
Message sent with link to nef files.
I'd love to see what RC could get out of those. Not that you did a bad job, it looks good, but some of those bushes look a bit funky to the right of the path.
+Gerard Blacklock, if you search Google+ for 'richard creamer panorama yosemite' you can see some of my first attempts at panoramas, some of which are 180 degrees or larger. I'm certainly not an expert, just getting started, really. (First year with good camera.) Keep sharing your great work! 90% of my photo learning comes from the impressive photos other photographers post on G+.
nice pano